I noticed some calculations seemed to be off when looking at my data spreadsheet, and realize that some numbers could be off due to a ‘margin of error’ in the equipment, so reran some of the tests to verify the results, and got the same numbers.
The results showed that when doubling the plates the amps and output were not quite doubled, tripled, etc as one would have thought. Then I spotted a possible flaw in plate surface calculation, then a second flaw and figured I pass them on, since the numbers now come out within 2% when doubling and tripling surface area.
First lets start with a 2 x 5 in plate, 10 sq in surface area. Sort of, I punched 2 – 1/4″ holes in each, pi*r*r = area of circle, so the two holes remove 0.3925″, leaving 9.6075 sq in., so remove any holes or slots that may have been cut or drilled into the plates.
Second there are 2 sides to the plate in contact with the water, sort of, take 2 plates, one +, one -, only one side of each is producing gas, the other 2 do nothing. So if you have 10 plates, effectively only both sides of 9 plates are in contact, so multiply number of plates-1, by 2, by area of plate, so 10 of these plates are 86.4675 sq in not 96.075 producing gas. A large difference when thinking there would be 100 sq in with 10 plates of 2×5.
This minor difference added at least 14% difference in numbers collected, the 2% error so far I think I can attribute to the surface of the hole on the edge (inside the holes) and possibly the edges of the plates when submerged.
Now when I’m producing 300ml with 5 plates @ 3 amps, and then double them to 9 plates and I get 600ml @ 6 amps, the numbers even work out. And before you say 5*2 is 10, not in this case, 5 plates have 4 working pairs, 9 plates have 8 working pairs, so yes 5*2=9 in this case.
Hope this helps when calculating a new HFE cell construction to get more accurate results.
Filed under: Cell Type, Output testing | 6 Comments »